ANALISIS STRATEGIK IMPLEMENTASI MANAJEMEN PENINGKATAN MUTU BERBASIS SEKOLAH (MPMBS) (Studi Kasus: SMP NEGERI 23 KOTA BANDUNG)
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Purpose – To know the implementation of school-based quality improvement management (MPMBS) in an effort to improve the effectiveness of learning process at SMP Negeri 23 Bandung. Findings – The declining quality and competitiveness of education have become one of the obstacles in preparing the reliable human resources and the spirit of global level competition, so that the right strategy is needed to overcome them. Methodology –The steps taken in the research is using Qualitative Descriptive approach method. Technique of collecting data was done by observation, interview by circulating questionnaire, and documentation study. Data analysis model used is strategy formulation through data reduction, conclusion, verification and SWOT analysis calculation. Testing and Realization – The result of calculation usingthe Cartesian SWOT diagram is that the coordinate point of school position is at power axis point 0.60 and axis probability 0.75 for strength (S) = 1.80, weakness (W) = 1.20, opportunity (O) = 1.95 and threat (T) = 1.20. The internal Factor Analysis shows a power figure of 1.80 on a scale of 1 to 4 indicates a number that is still lacking in the power category. The difference between S and W is relatively small (0.60), means that the strength is possible to cover the weakness if the school do things that contribute to the power aspect. The External Factor Analysis shows the number of opportunities (O) = 1.95 and Threat (T) = 1.20. The difference between O and T is 0.75 can be used as an input to improve the ability and look for other opportunities from outside. In the analysis of Cartesian SWOT diagram with strength axispoint 0.60 and probability axis0.75 can be obtained a strategy that is considered appropriate for the school, that is the aggressive strategy, to improve the power aspects (S) to obtain value Opportunities (O) from the outside effectively and efficiently
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
LPPM Politeknik Piksi Ganesha Indonesia
References
2. Ambar Teguh Sulistiani Rosidah, (2009), Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Yogyakarta. Graha Ilmu.
3. Hadian Dedi, Adang,(2013), Pemahaman Terhadap Ilmu Perilaku Organisasi, Buku kesatu, Bandung : CV. Warta Bagja
4. E. Porter, Michael. 1994. Keunggulan Bersaing. (Terjemahan : Tim Binarupa Aksara) Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.
5. Amir, M. Taufiq, 2011, Manajemen Strategik Kosep dan Aplikasi, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
6. Kamaluddin, Murdjani, dan Jusuf Abadi Muh, 2011, Manajemen Strategi Teori dan Kajian Empiris, Kendari: Unhalu Press
7. Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Jabar, Cepi Safruddin Abdul (2010). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
8. Depdiknas. (2007a). Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Manajemen Peran Serta Masyarakat dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan Sekolah. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan.
9. Fattah, Nanang (2009). Landasan Manajemen Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Mulyasa, H.E. (2007). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah; Konsep, Strategi dan Implementasi. Bandung: Rosda.
10. Sagala, Syaiful (2011). Manajemen Strategik dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, cv.
11. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen. (2006). Jakarta: Diperbanyak oleh PT Armas Duta Jaya.