Pengaruh Hutang Modal Dan Aset Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study examines the effect of debt and asset growth on profitability (ROE). The population of the company is LQ45 on the IDX. The sample criteria were divided into 2, namely group I DAR <50% and II DAR> 50%. The goal is to determine the profitability between groups. Multiple linear regression data analysis techniques. The test results in group I DAR and DER have no significant effect. Asset growth has a significant effect, while LDER has a negative effect on ROE. The results in group II DAR, DER, and Asset Growth do not have a significant effect, while LDER has a negative effect on ROE. Simultaneously the variables in group I have a positive effect on ROE, while in group II the simultaneous test has a significant effect if the confidence level is lowered at 90%. The profitability of group I averaged 17.04% below the ROE of Group II which averaged 23.89%. The essence is that changes in debt are not effective at boosting profitability, an increase in debt risks reducing profits. The implication is that companies must explore sources of capital other than debt in order to increase profitability. This fundamental analysis provides information for investors as well as demonstrates the importance of paying attention to other factors as a consideration for business decisions.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
LPPM Politeknik Piksi Ganesha Indonesia
References
Arifin, J. (2017). SPSS 24 Untuk Penelitian dan Skripsi. PT Elex Media Komputindo
Brigham dan Ehrhardt. 2005. Financial Management Theory And Practice, Eleventh Edition. Ohio: South Western Cengage Learning.
Christiawan, Yulius Jogi dan Josua Tarigan. 2007. Kepemilikan Manajeral: Kebijakan Hutang, Kinerja dan Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi danKeuangan, Vol. 9 No.1. Hal. 1-8. Surabaya: Universitas Kristen Petra.
Ghozali, I. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gitman, Lawrence J. 2006. Principles of Manajerial Finance. International Edition, 10 th edition. Boston: Pearson Education.
Harmono. 2009. Manajemen Keuangan Berbasis Balanced Scorecard (Pendekatan Teori, Kasus, dan Riset Bisnis). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kasmir. 2008. Anliasis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Keown Arthur J. Scott David, Jr D. Marthin, Petty J. William. 2000. Dasar-dasarManajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Harahap, S. S. 2003. Teori Akuntansi. Jakarta: Penerbit Rajagrafindo Persada.
Harahap, S. S. 2006. Analisis Kritis atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/saham-saham-ini-naik-lebih-dari-100-sepanjang-2020-berjalan-bagaimana-kinerjanya?
https://www.invesnesia.com/perusahaan-manufaktur
Irham Fahmi.Manajemen Keuangan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
Komputer, W. (2009). SPSS 17 Untuk Mengelola Data Statistik. Edisi Pertama. Semarang: Andi dan Wahana Komputer.
Kusumajaya (2012) Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Terhadap Profitabilitas Dan Nilai Perusahaan Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Bursa Efek Indonesia
Rahayu dan Sari (2017) Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Nilai Perusahaan
Sartono, Agus. 2001. Manajemen Keuangan Teori Dan Aplikasi. Edisi 4, Yogyakarta : BPFE
Santoso, S. (2014). Statistik Nonparametik. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Syarinah Sianipar. Pengaruh Struktur Modal Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Sektor Makanan Dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jom Fisip Volume 4 No.1 Februari 2017
Setiadewi Dan Purbawangsa (2015) Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Leverage Terhadap Profitabilitas Dan Nilai Perusahaan
Weston, J. Fred dan Eugene F. Brigham, 1997. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan. Edisi Kesembilan. Jakarta: Erlangga.