Digital Forensics Implementation on CCTV Using ISO/IEC 27037 and ISO/IEC 27042
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Digital evidence in the form of CCTV footage is crucial data in legal investigations, but its integrity and authenticity are often questioned due to the lack of standardization of digital forensic procedures. This study aims to design and test the effectiveness of the implementation of a digital forensic framework based on the international standards ISO/IEC 27037:2012 (guidelines for acquisition and preservation) and ISO/IEC 27042 (guidelines for analysis and interpretation). The research method involves the application of the four-stage procedural ISO/IEC 27037 (Identification, Collection, Acquisition, and Preservation) on a CCTV V380 MicroSD card, followed by analysis using ISO/IEC 27042 principles and Autopsy software. The results show that this framework is fully effective. The integrity of the digital evidence is guaranteed, evidenced by the consistency of hash values (MD5 and SHA1) that are verified Matched throughout the acquisition process until the preparation for analysis. Furthermore, the analysis procedure successfully retrieves information from videos that have been deleted from Unallocated Space, complete with important forensic metadata. This study concludes that the ISO/IEC framework has proven effective in ensuring the authenticity of evidence, and is therefore recommended as a scientifically and legally valid standard operating procedure model for forensic practitioners.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
[2] S. Mehta, “The Critical Role of CCTV Footage in Modern Criminal Investigation,” J. Digit. Forensics Law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 45–58, 2023.
[3] F. Mualfah and R. A. Ramadhan, “Analisis Forensik Video CCTV untuk Identifikasi Pelaku Kejahatan,” J. RESTI Rekayasa Sist. Dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 890–896, 2020.
[4] R. Ahmed, “Challenges in Maintaining Integrity of Digital Video Evidence,” Int. J. Cyber Secur., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 112–125, 2021.
[5] P. Johnson, “Preservation of Digital Evidence: Protocols for Long-term Integrity,” J. Digit. Forensics Secur. Law, vol. 16, no. 3, 2021.
[6] M. I. Asy’ari and others, “Analisis Forensik Digital pada Rekaman CCTV Menggunakan Metode NIST,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Komput., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2024.
[7] K. Miller and J. Harris, “Best Practices for Bit-Stream Acquisition of Solid State Storage,” Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig., vol. 40, p. 301340, 2022.
[8] A. S. Putra and others, “Analisis Tahapan Forensik Digital pada Rekaman CCTV untuk Deteksi Kejahatan,” J. Sist. Inf. Dan Komput., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 200–210, 2022.
[9] B. Nugraha and others, “Forensic Analysis of V380 Smart Camera Storage System,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 230, pp. 445–454, 2024.
[10] L. Taylor, “Procedural Inconsistency in Digital Forensics: A Legal Perspective,” Comput. Law Secur. Rev., vol. 44, p. 105642, 2022.
[11] B. Williams, “Standardizing Digital Evidence Handling in Law Enforcement,” Polic. J. Policy Pract., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1820–1835, 2021.
[12] A. Kumar, “Framework for Scientifically Validated Digital Forensic Investigation,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 12345–12356, 2022.
[13] A. Mubarok and others, Designing Digital Forensic Framework for IoT Devices based on ISO 27037, vol. 2700. 2024.
[14] E. Faizal and A. Luthfi, “Implementasi Standar ISO 27037 dalam Penanganan Bukti Elektronik,” J. Keamanan Siber Dan Forensik Digit., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 27037, 2024.
[15] E. Faizal and A. Luthfi, “Analisis Kepatuhan Prosedur Forensik Digital Berbasis ISO 27037,” Indones. J. Comput., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2025.
[16] R. Anderson and T. Moore, “Integrity Challenges in SD Card Forensics for IoT Devices,” Comput. Secur., vol. 108, p. 102345, 2021.
[17] H. Setya and D. Suganda, “Peran First Responder dalam Menjaga Chain of Custody Bukti Digital,” J. Kriminol. Indones., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2022.
[18] T. Davis, “Admissibility of Digital Evidence: Legal Standards and Technical Reliability,” J. Law Technol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 112–130, 2023.
[19] D. Hariyadi and others, “Digital Evidence Integrity Assurance using Blockchain,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 6, 2023.
[20] B. Santoso, “Aspek Legalitas Bukti Digital dalam Hukum Acara Pidana di Indonesia,” J. Huk. Dan Peradil., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 301–318, 2022.
[21] E. Mirfandaresky, “Hash-Based Integrity Verification in Multimedia Forensics,” J. Inf. Secur., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 201–215, 2022.